Ilford Delta 400
With the development process used, the correct ASA for Delta 400 is 200. This note describes how that was determined.
Exposure Test
1. Set meter to ASA 400.
1. Pick scene in back yard, prop up the 18% gray card and take
reading which was 1/500 @ f11.
1. Open stops to f2 and then take one picture each from f2 through
f16 and a final one at 1000 and f16.
1. Process in 1:1 XTOL. The recommended development times are 13 min
at 20 deg C and 9:30 min at 24 deg C. The temperature was 22 deg C,
so the development time was 10:30 min.
Equivalent Film Speed
The equivalent film speeds for the series
| Speed | Aperture | Equiv ASA |
| 1/500 | 2 | 6 |
| 1/500 | 2.8 | 12 |
| 1/500 | 6 | 25 |
| 1/500 | 5.6 | 60 |
| 1/500 | 8 | 100 |
| 1/500 | 11 | 200 |
| 1/500 | 16 | 400 |
| 1/1000 | 16 | 800 |
Time Temperature Charts
This is the
XTOL chart from Kodak for Delta 400. They are assuming small tank
development and 100 ml (3.5 fl. oz) of developer per roll. At 1:1 we
are using 4 fl oz per roll, so there should be enough developer
solution for the following tables to be correct. However, we did not
get rated ASA in this test even with extended times!
| FRESH, DILUTE DEVELOPER |
| ROLL FILM |
FORMAT |
EI |
CI |
DEVELOPER DILUTION |
| 1:1 |
68°F 20°C |
70°F 21°C |
75°F 24°C |
80°F 27°C |
ILFORD DELTA 400 |
135 |
100/200 |
0.52 |
9 |
8 |
6 |
4¾* |
| 400 |
0.58 |
10½ |
9½ |
7 |
5½ |
| 800 |
0.65 |
12¼ |
11 |
8½ |
6½ |
| 1600 |
0.75 |
14½ |
13 |
10 |
8 |
| 3200 |
0.85 |
17 |
15½ |
12 |
9½ |
It seems to be a
common
complaint that the Kodak recommended times are too short. The author
of this note suggests the developer volume is too low, but per the
current recommendation in the previous paragraph, this is not true.
This chart is from the inside of the Delta 400 box. Notice, these
times are much longer than shown on the Kodak literature. Do you
suppose that's one of the reasons for doing these tests?
| FRESH, DILUTE DEVELOPER |
| ROLL FILM |
FORMAT |
EI |
DEVELOPER DILUTION |
| 1:1 |
68°F 20°C |
75°F 24°C |
ILFORD DELTA 400 |
135 |
500 |
13 |
9½ |
| 800 |
15½ |
11½ |
| 1600 |
20 |
14 |
| 3200 |
- |
18 |
Scott
Eaton suggests Microdol-X and a respondent to that article is using
XTOL 1:1 at an EI of 320.
Here are the times recommended by the
Massive Development
Chart that Scott Eaton recommends. The EI 500, 20 deg C times are the
same as the table above, so this chart is following the manufacturers
recommendations.
| Developer |
ASA |
35mm |
Roll |
Sheet |
Temp |
| Xtol (1+1) |
200 |
9 |
9 |
|
20°C |
| Xtol (1+1) | 500 | 13 | 13 | | 20°C |
| Xtol (1+1) | 800 | 15.5 | 15.5 | | 20°C |
| Xtol (1+1) | 1600 | 20 | 20 | | 20°C |
| Xtol (1+1) | 3200 | 18 | 18 | | 24°C |
Test Shots
|
A 'V' was cut into the processed negative at each picture
boundary. The films were scanned so the 'V' was visible. The exposure
adjustment was set for manual adjustment. Here is the result at a
gamma of 1.8.
|
|
And here is the scanner exposure set at a gamma of 1.4. You can see
that in this exposure, the black between is black where in the shot
above it is not. This setting sets the black exposure.
|
|
Here is the ASA 100 exposure, too light - overexposed.
|
|
Now the best exposure becomes clear and is ASA 200.
|
|
And here is the ASA 400 exposure - underexposed.
|
Last modified: Wed, 22-Aug-01 20:11:46 PDT
|